You want to know what I love?  When companies announce new video-related products or services.  Seriously… I'm a video nut, and I get excited about new things.  Want to know what I hate?  When new products or services are announced, but not remotely explained.  Such is the case today.

TwitVid has announced a new ad platform, called SocialAds, which aims to help brands get more social media followers and friends.  The ads are similar to Google's Adwords program, in that advertisers only pay for user actions and not raw impressions.  Advertisers set up campaign specs, and can even place ads on videos from famous celebrities or target them to specific demographics.  Under their price-per-action model, SocialAds is all about getting you more followers and retweets, and bidding begins at $1-per-follower and $0.75-per-retweet.

The news of this new ad platform is all over the place this morning… InformationWeek, WebProNews, MediaPost, TheNextWeb.  And all of these sources mention how SocialAds intends to help brands advertise in a way that also brings more social followers to them.  All of the sources mention SocialAds' incredible conversion numbers from their beta—according to SocialAds themselves, an unspecified number of anonymous beta testing companies received 400 new followers in less than an hour.  Of course, since the number of advertisers experiencing that benefit is a mystery, as is their brand name, then that number actually means nothing to me.  Oh well.

All of these news sources also point out that the system has a deep analytics portion that will allow advertisers to track campaigns' effectiveness.  But do you know what none of them does?  None of them shows me what SocialAds advertisements actually look like.  They all mention that the ads will be different from traditional preroll ads… but then they stop right there and don't explain how they'll be different.  It feels like most of these sites just churned out the raw information contained in a press release they got from SocialAds.

So I went to SocialAds website, because surely they would explain what makes their ads unique, right?  You might even assume they would have a video showing what the ads look like.  But that assumption would be wrong.  Oh, there's a video alright.  But it's maddeningly vague on the details.  They do get points for showing the back-end, with a few screenshots of the advertisers' dashboard where the campaigns are managed.  But there's not one single image or video that actually shows the ad in action.  Why is that?  There's no About page or FAQ page.  There's just a video… and then sign up and login options. You can watch that video if you want to see what I'm talking about:

ALSO ►  GE: Harnessing the Power of YouTube Creators to Tell Its Story [Case Study]

If I want to buy a billboard or a magazine advertisement… I already know what those look like.  I don't need to see an example first (though I will most certainly want to see a proof of my ad before it goes live).  But when an ad platform touts itself as something original and completely new… it just seems like a misstep to not show examples of what the ad looks like.

I don't know about you, but I'm not as inclined to just trust SocialAds beta testing numbers and leap in with both feet.  How do I know the ads aren't obnoxious overlay ads or useless banner/display ads on the video's hosting page?  How do I know what they look like?  It's kind of infuriating.  I'm also not sure that new Twitter followers are really worth a dollar.

That being said, I'm still intrigued.  I guess I'm intrigued by almost any new video advertisement, and when you add in the social aspect it only gets more interesting.  But I can't exactly recommend the ad platform if I can't get a look at it.  And I'm definitely not putting my advertising dollars into it without some kind of demo.  At least give me a screenshot.  It's like their pitch is this:  "new ad format, twitter-related, video-related… give us money.”

But I'm apparently the only person that feels this way, as everyone else is touting the launch of SocialAds as something exciting and buzz-worthy.  It's getting tons of press and will probably get lots of initial users.  The promise of the ability to leverage the fame of users like Jimmy Fallon or Shaq is too enticing, I'd guess.  Assuming the ads look nice and aren't too large or too distracting, it's probably worth checking out.  But that's a pretty big assumption, and one that SocialAds could easily prevent me from having to make.

Everyone wants to harness the power and popularity of social media for business purposes.  And there are a lot of different ways to try and do that.  I'm all for companies being inventive.  I'm all for new video ad platforms and networks.  I'm just also for a little more detail.  I'm for seeing what you buy before you buy it.  Anyone who has taken the plunge and paid for these things—or participated in the beta—should feel encouraged to let us know what your experience was like in the comments below.  It might help some of us buy in if we can get a first-hand account.

  • Amer Kawar

    Screen shots of how the ad looks is online now.

    Seems pretty cool!

    • chrisfoster

      If were on the net, were logged into Twitter...why would they ask for an ID and password rather than asking for authorization....looks interesting though

  • Videopush

    2010 is the yeat of the online video

  • Christophor Rick

    You should have included this:

    "Traditional means of monetizing video has heavily relied on pre-roll ads, which work great for premium content but can be quite suffocating for an end-user who may only be trying to watch a short video," said Mo Al Adham, co-founder of TwitVid. "SocialAds offers an alternative.

    That way our resident troll (George Bear) sees that I'm not the only one that doesn't want to watch a pre-roll video that's quite possibly longer than the video content I'm seeking.

    On top of stole my topic for the day! heh That's twice this week.

    • Jeremy Scott

      Dang, man. Sorry. Totally an accident, though I may make a game of it now and try to steal more topics. :)

      • Aliciahalatsis

        Hi Jeremy,

        Thank you for the inquisitive review. I would love to set up an interview with Mo Al Adham, co-founder of TwitVid to answer the questions you raise above. I can also send you screen shots of SocialAds. Please feel free to send me an email with your contact information.

        [email protected]

        (on behalf of TwitVid)

        • chrisfoster

          I hear you on this Jeremy, please post an update when you have conversed with Mo Al Adham

        • Jeremy Scott

          Will do, Chris. Trying to set that up now.