The Past, Present, and Future of Enterprise Video

The Past, Present, and Future of Enterprise Video

What's the next major shift for video in the enterprise? Below is an observation of the evolution of enterprise video from the past to the present, and a suggestion for what's to come. For consistency, let's evaluate the four parts of video for each period in time: 1) creation, 2) management, 3) delivery, and 4) tracking.

The Past of Enterprise Video

Theme: Television, large dollars

Before the internet, the primary use of video lived on television. Whether a 30-second commercial or a recorded VHS/DVD training program (or in the case of Home Depot, its own television channel) the costs involved precluded most organizations from using it. As a result, there were fairly limited use cases outside of the entertainment industry. To frame how video worked in the past:

Creation. One day of shooting with a professional crew could easily cost upwards of $100,000 (if not more) by the time the video was recorded and produced. Personal devices were not an option for creating videos.

Management. Organizing VHS tapes and DVDs required physical space. Searching was not unlike looking up an index card at the library, though there were some early forms of transcription programs available even with VHS tapes.

Delivery. Limited primarily to television, delivering a commercial involved working with the networks that owned the airwaves. Mailing out tapes or DVDs was a shipping department responsibility.

Tracking. Broadcasts had significant tracking challenges, especially as it related to tying a commercial campaign to revenue generated. Mailers were impossible to track outside of the anecdotal realm.

Big dollars, big productions, big companies, big, big, big. Video before the internet was truly a different breed than it is today. Furthermore, marketing departments in charge of outward facing video-related projects had limited accountability as the limits in video tracking mechanisms made it next to impossible to track results (remember Harris Polls?).

The Present of Enterprise Video

Theme: Transition to the internet, large volume, lower costs

Its 2004, enter Brightcove (founded before YouTube was in 2005). Brightcove was founded with "a vision for the transformation of television with the Internet" and has grown to the point of filing their S-1 on August 24th to raise up to $50M in a public offering. They truly pioneered online video. Since then many others have joined the race, including KIT Digital (NASDAQ: KITD), Sierra Ventures backed Ooyala, Avalon Ventures backed Kaltura, and more. According to Brightcove's S-1, "We estimate our total addressable market for online video platforms to be approximately $2.3 billion in 2011, growing to approximately $5.8 billion in 2015.”

The internet created a powerful new medium for video, now a multi-billion dollar market expected to grow at a 26% CAGR. Furthermore, enterprise video is now a reasonable investment for most any company. However, with the lower costs comes a dramatic increase in volume and new challenges:

Creation. Video creation is now as low as $100s. Products like DSLR cameras, the late FlipVideo, Camtasia, and smart phones brought the concept of video production to the masses. Sharing platforms led by YouTube brought the decorum for video production professionalism away from the "experts" and into the hands of the everyman. Networks of "professional videographers" like BBN3, Turnhere, and Pixelfish popped up and have effectively commoditized video production. Video is becoming a standard, and thus a required additional cost, for most corporate websites. Determining the required investment in a corporate video that will positively represent your brand but also seem more personal than a television commercial is a new challenge for marketing.

Management. Dozens of proprietary and public Online Video Platforms (OVPs) have made it fairly simple to organize your videos. However, with the dramatic increase in volume, searching videos is increasingly becoming a challenge. How does one search a medium that doesn't inherently have much of any searching data? Sure you can tag and transcribe the video, but if I want to find a video with a horse running through a field, how will I know there won't be clouds in the sky? Search will likely continue to be a significant challenge going forward.

Delivery. With more and more companies spending their budgets on video, comes a requirement that everyone who can see the video, does. A few years ago one might have made the argument that video would "standardize" on the web. Quite the opposite has happened. There are now more creation and viewing devices than ever, all with different format, resolution, and bandwidth requirements.

Tracking. The transition of enterprise video to the internet has brought with it dramatic increases in tracking capabilities. Now we can tell unique views for a given video, the percentage of a video viewed, what devices are viewing the video, where in the world people are viewing the video, and more. Advertisements within online videos have become a new source of revenue (pre-rolls, post-rolls, overlays, and in some cases in-video ads, the latter with limited success).

The internet scaled modern video. Marketing is still primarily in charge of the videos (with training departments next in line). Marketing is also held more accountable because it now has tools to track the effectiveness of videos as it relates to online purchases and brand awareness.

So what's next?

The Future of Enterprise Video

Theme: Push to the individual, control

The use of online video in most corporations is still generally limited to the savvy users and those who control the corporate brand. Furthermore, the capabilities have grown so complex that one almost has to employ programmers to truly implement OVPs effectively. That said, individuals throughout organizations are realizing how engaging and effective videos are, and as a result are hacking ways together to incorporate video into their communications. Sales people are starting to send out links to product demos, customer testimonials, webinars, announcements, and other videos on their corporate website or YouTube Channel. They are starting to use these videos as collateral.

However, solutions today aren't really designed for this behavior – from either a sales or marketing perspective. If a salesperson sends you a link to a video on their corporate website, when you click on that link, there is nothing on the webpage you are looking at that lets you know who sent you the video and the salesperson has effectively lost control of your attention. Furthermore, the salesperson doesn't know if you've watched their video.

Marketing is also missing out on powerful tracking data. The marketer can't track which videos their salespeople are using most and which ones are most effective for them. They might also have videos that shouldn't be published for the masses but can still be powerful sales assets – customer references, webinars, GoToMeetings, certain product features, etc. If marketing wants to track how their salespeople are using their videos and they are regulated by the SEC, FDA, EEOC, or other governing body, they will run into issues of enforcing compliant use. Last, this type of tracking data starts to become relevant to other systems – like CRM – to which the marketing and sales organizations have already subscribed.

So what's next for enterprise video? Empowerment of the individual.

How does this affect the 4 parts to video?

Creation. Marketing will still control the creation of videos in the same way they develop most all outbound communications. A small and growing percentage of innovative sales people might join the creation side, but the quality of video they produce as a representative of their organization will need to be controlled to maintain brand standards.

Management. The management of the video database will change dramatically. Multiple users will access the database with differing credentials, multiple "instances" of each video for every sales person will have to be organized, and usage data will need to be analyzed and communicated to the appropriately credentialed users, to name a few of the significant changes. On top of everything, an increase in the number of users on an application requires a simplification of usability.

Delivery. Videos will still need to be viewed across all devices. Branding will become the biggest concern.

Tracking. Marketing will now be able to tell how effective a video is by sales person, by customer, by campaign, etc. Why was the webinar in August watched much more by sales follow up than the one in July? How will that change my message for the webinar in September? If my best sales people are sending out the most videos how can I motivate the others to follow suit?

Empowerment of the individual within the enterprise is seen in other applications like Salesforce.com's Chatter and Jive Software (who recently filed their S-1). If video follows suit, sales and marketing organizations stand to gain more return on their videos and increase overall effectiveness. That said, "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future.”

About Our Contributing Author - Adam Peterson
As the Founder and CEO of Vipe Inc, Adam leads the company’s vision, marketing, and business development strategy. He is sought after as a dynamic, visionary speaker and has addressed the California Staffing Professionals Statewide Conference, Stanford's School of Business as a featured ecommerce entrepreneur, San Jose State University's School of Business, SDA Bocconi School of Management (University of Milan), and numerous Web 2.0 Marketing webinars.



Please Note: Opinions expressed in this article are those of the contributing author and not necessarily that of

Become a Contributor: Occasionally, we like to offer experts within the online video industry the chance to write a post for ReelSEO. We like it because it offers you readers great content, and it comes directly from those in the field that are working on the technologies to power this online video revolution of sorts ;-) If you are interested in becoming a contributing author, please feel free to let us know. Read our post on becoming a contributor for additional information.

What do you think? ▼
  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=10101224 Jon O’Brien

    Nice write up. In regards to your Future issues - you should check out Wiredrive (http://www.wiredrive.com/) and the new Vimeo Pro account.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=647021009 John Robins

    Hi Adam - Great report, and actually the future is already here - http://www.8amworldwide.com and http://www.8amworldwide.com/advanced-media-centre.html (demo video, little dull but makes the point).

    NewzPoint is a multichannel multimedia publishing, broadcasting and archiving technology - it can be set up in many different ways for different specific purposes, can deliver multimedia content to web, smartphones and tablets, has detailed analytics and is very affordable.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=704326024 Michael Daun

    Great post! Results-driven enterprise video is clearly the way to go, and we are only at the beginning of this, both in terms of the tools available and the organizations' capacity to act on these.

    On the topic of maintaining brand standards, I as founder of www.incloode.com, am speaking in our own interest:

    Controlling the branding of videos and at the same time empowering individuals to make videos in a simple yet professionally-looking way, is very possible using video templates.

    Video templates are pre-formatted with graphics, effects, instructions and more. Users simply drop theirs video, images and text into it and it is then mixed automatically.

    Incloode's Videoplate Platform allows companies to create and integrate video templates on their websites to be used by the9r employees, partners or customers for sales videos, how-tos, testimonials, viral campaigns etc. Check out more at http://www.incloode.com or http://studio.incloode.com.

  • http://get.buto.tv/ Mark Symington

    Great post Adam - really like the fact it tells an accessible story. A lot of organisations are in the position of knowing they want to do something, but not understanding what or how and I think this will really help them.

    I think the ability to track individual video views is already here though - it certainly is within our platform Buto, where individually appended URLs will appear as separate host sites in the analytics section, or even using Buto's API when databases can create unlimited instances of each video for comprehensive analysis.

    In terms of the future of online video, the big missing word I think is content. It's very tempting to see all these tools and techniques as ends in themselves - but content still has to be interesting, useful or entertaining if it's to work. The platform can help with the second most important bit - delivery. But the content, and the strategy that defines the calls to action, the seeding plan, the interactivity etc. is where our Enterprise level clients look to us for bespoke advice.

    Content, more than anything, is what must perform harder than ever, be more accountable, and increasingly tailored to the individual, in the future of online video.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1112303204 Ken Schreiner

    Excellent analysis! You touched on the "everyman" concept of video production which is the core of my business model. I'm a sole proprietor and it's been very effective for me as it dovetails off a concept that I.T. spawned in the 1980s: the Superuser. My customers appreciate, for economic and logistical reasons, that they don't have to deal with numerous different vendors for video, graphics, stills, writing, narration, on-camera performance, animation, music, and other skills previously the exclusive domain of specialists. On-line video is itself a specialty. And has developed into an exciting and lucrative one.

  • Anna Runkle

    Another slam dunk from you guys. Thank you.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1519971785 Lynn Carrillo

    Video will take over the internet faster that we know it. I can't wait.

  • Catharine Fennell

    This is a great synopsis of the state of enterprise video. Nice to see the video creation category starting to be recognized. Brand management and quality control are essential elements of professional video creation and what we have built our business around http://www.videobio.com.

  • http://www.videoleadsonline.com VideoLeadsOnline

    I like your quote "Use... Videos as Collateral" - that sums up video usage by sales people as well as unintended Salespeople.

    Interesting, eh?

  • Céline Maublanc Gerakin

    This is a great article!
    I wanted to add a few words about "monetization" which could fit perfectly in the present and future paragraphs. Now, there is the possibility to add paywalls to the video, either it is broadcasting live or vod. This is a great new source of revenue (especially when the corporation/individual want to cover the production costs).

    Marketing helps to estimate the value of the video content and know if the targeted audience is willing to pay for it. There are a few providers already offering video streaming platform with monetization models such as www.MonetizeMedia.com or www.DaCast.com or Youtube.

    In a near future, people will be streaming college classes, conferences, trade shows... because of the commute and the travel costs (and for convenience), but they will bear the price of the video!

    • Dominique DG

      Interesting!

  • ThomasB

    Nice review. But I think a lot of what you mention is already present in the market. We are a European firm (Germany) and we are using start2learn (http://www.start2learn.be) as a video platform. It handles everything from converting and editing the video to deliverying it enriched with presentations and such. I personally think the real evolution of video in organizations will be about functional domains, not really technology.

  • scmym

    We have been using Odeo Enterprise Video Management and have been quite pleased. We are in the US and needed to have both a desktop/laptop solution with mobile support. We have seen a significant growth in productivity since this platform was released.